Alex Smart Premium Picks
Alex Smart has been wagering professionally on sports and horse racing for the better part of 30 years. He has numerous top 10 Basketball and Football finishes at the Sports Monitor since becoming documented 17 years ago and has consistently finished among the nations top handicappers in all major North American sports venues
Alex Smart

Where winning means everything! Get the info the books do not want you to have
PREMIUM PICK STREAKS
Basketball Totals (+11240) 1639-1391 L3030 54%
NBA Picks (+9080) 2211-1946 L4157 53%
NCAA-B Totals (+3558) 528-447 L975 54%
NHL Money Lines (+3427) 163-118 L281 58%
All Sports Totals (+2304) 1018-902 L1920 53%
MLB Money Lines (+1324) 1228-1163 L2391 51%
NFLX Sides (+1196) 25-12 L37 68%
NCAA-F Totals (+1012) 189-163 L352 54%
Football Picks (+774) 64-51 L115 56%
Soccer Picks (+439) 21-14 L35 60%
Short-Term Subscription Options
With this subscription you get EVERY SINGLE PLAY released for the day of your purchase.
With this subscription you'll get every single play released for 3 consecutive days! This is our most popular subscription during football season because when purchased Saturday morning it gets you all of Saturday and Sunday's picks PLUS any plays on Monday Night Football!
*This subscription currently includes 6 NFL picks but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Looking for some great value? Pick up a weekly package and get SEVEN DAYS full days of picks! It's easy to see why this is one of the most popular choices on the site.
*This subscription currently includes 6 NFL picks but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Long-Term Subscription Options
SAVE A TON of money with a 30 Day subscription! You'll literally pay a fraction of the cost by signing up for a full month instead of making a single purchase each day!
*This subscription currently includes 6 NFL picks but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Currently on a 46-36 CFB run since 10/03/26.
This subscription includes EVERY CFB PREMIUM PICK I release through the end of the NCAA Tournament! Join now and start cashing in on more winners!
Currently on a 64-53 Basketball run since 03/22/26.
This subscription includes EVERY CBB & NBA PREMIUM PICK I release through the end of the NBA Finals! Join now and start cashing in on more winners!
*This subscription currently includes 1 NBA pick but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
**5x Top 10 NBA handicapper!**
Now on a 7-6 run with my last 13 NBA picks! $1,000/game players have cashed in $28,320 on my NBA picks since 01/21/25 and $90,880 on my NBA picks since 12/13/16!
This subscription includes EVERY NBA PREMIUM PICK I release through the end of the NBA Finals! Join now and start cashing in on more winners!
*This subscription currently includes 1 NBA pick but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Currently on a 64-51 Football run since 10/01/26.
This subscription includes EVERY CFB & NFL PREMIUM PICK I release through the Super Bowl! Join now and start cashing in on more winners!
*This subscription currently includes 6 NFL picks but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Currently on a 19-15 NFL run since 10/01/26.
This subscription includes EVERY NFL PREMIUM PICK I release through the Super Bowl! Join now and start cashing in on more winners!
*This subscription currently includes 6 NFL picks but more may be added during the term of the subscription.
Free picks
Cincinnati enters this international matchup at 5-2 while averaging 29.4 points per game, ranking among the league’s highest-scoring offenses. Atlanta sits at 3-5 and has allowed 23.6 points per game, a mid-pack figure that has not consistently contained high-efficiency passing attacks. The total sits at 52.5, the highest number on the Sunday slate, after climbing from the open. On a neutral floor in Madrid, both systems lean toward volume rather than sustained defensive control.
Cincinnati’s offense generates volume through the air while converting at a high rate on third downs. The Bengals rank near the top of the league in points scored and have produced multiple 30-plus-point outings in recent weeks, including a 43-36 overtime result against Tennessee. Their defense ranks in the middle of the league in points allowed and has shown the ability to create pressure, yet it has not shut down opposing offenses for full games. Atlanta’s offense leans on a strong ground game but ranks well down the list in points scored and third-down conversion. The Falcons’ defense sits near the middle in points allowed and has not produced the sustained stops required against top-tier passing attacks. When one side ranks near the top in scoring efficiency and the other ranks in the middle in points allowed, the combined total has historically climbed above elevated numbers more often than not. The international setting removes typical home-field variables and places both teams in a neutral environment where pace and efficiency tend to dictate the outcome.
Joe Burrow has thrown for more than 2,100 yards with 20 touchdowns through seven games, operating with high completion percentage and yards per attempt. He is flanked by Tee Higgins and Ja’Marr Chase, both of whom have produced consistent volume and explosive plays. That group forces defenses to commit extra attention to the primary targets, which opens secondary scoring. Michael Penix Jr. has been less consistent for Atlanta, and the Falcons’ supporting cast has not matched Cincinnati’s top-end production through the air. Bijan Robinson provides a clear individual advantage on the ground for Atlanta, yet the overall offensive structure has not sustained high-efficiency drives against better defenses. When the favored side’s primary quarterback is healthy and clicking and the opposing defense ranks in the middle of the league in points allowed, the margin of scoring tends to land in higher ranges. Both teams’ primary creators can occupy the ball for stretches, but Cincinnati’s supporting cast has shown greater reliability in recent weeks.
Cincinnati has gone over the total in multiple recent games, including the 79-point overtime result against Tennessee and the 48-point win over Baltimore. Atlanta’s results have shown more variance, with under results in some lower-scoring games and over results when facing stronger offenses. Historical meetings between these two have produced mixed totals, yet the current form of Cincinnati’s offense shifts the equation. League-wide, elevated totals in the low 50s have gone over at a solid rate when one team ranks near the top in points scored and the other ranks in the middle in points allowed. Early-season overs have also held in international or neutral-site environments where both teams play at a moderate-to-high pace. The combination of Cincinnati’s recent scoring output, Atlanta’s mid-tier defensive profile, and the elevated total makes the over the cleaner side of the number.
Key Smart Intelligence Formula
(Bengals points per game + Falcons points allowed per game) + (Falcons points per game + Bengals points allowed per game) ÷ 2
(29.4 + 23.6) + (21.4 + 22.6) ÷ 2 = 48.5 projected combined average.
Recent Cincinnati scoring (multiple 30-plus-point games) and the upward movement of the total push the practical projection above the posted 52.5. The Bengals should control stretches of the game and push the score into a higher range than the number suggests. Confirm the final total closer to kickoff.
YESTERDAY'S PLAYS
| Match Up | Pick | Rating | Score | Result | Profit | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holy Cross vs Villanova | Holy Cross +35 -110 | Free | 66-95 | Win | 100 | Show |
| Sharks vs Wild | Wild -1½ +102 | Premium | 1-4 | Win | 102 | Show |
| Celtics vs Hornets | UNDER 208½ -110 | Premium | 119-80 | Win | 100 | Show |
| 76ers vs Cavs | 76ers -2½ -108 | Premium | 95-119 | Loss | -108 | Show |
| Yale vs UCF | Yale +9½ -105 | Premium | 75-87 | Loss | -105 | Show |
| Michigan vs Connecticut | Michigan +7½ -110 | Premium | 77-85 | Loss | -110 | Show |
| Massachusetts vs Boston College | Massachusetts +6 -110 | Premium | 55-71 | Loss | -110 | Show |
| Nebraska vs Illinois | UNDER 50½ -110 | Premium | 13-24 | Win | 100 | Show |
| TCU vs Arizona | TCU +7½ -115 | Premium | 28-29 | Win | 100 | Show |
| South Florida vs East Carolina | South Florida +2½ -104 | Premium | 17-20 | Loss | -104 | Show |
| Nebraska vs Illinois | Illinois +4½ -110 | Premium | 13-24 | Win | 100 | Show |
| Virginia Tech vs SMU | Virginia Tech +6½ -110 | Premium | 28-51 | Loss | -110 | Show |
PICKS IN PROGRESS
The gap between these two systems is one of the clearest on the board. Carolina enters 13-3-2 with a +26 goal differential, sitting near the top of the league in both goals for (around 3.8 per game) and goals against (around 2.3). They generate heavy volume (often 33 shots per game) while suppressing the other way to league-best levels (roughly 22–23 shots against). Their 5-on-5 expected-goals share has hovered in the high 50s to low 60s, with strong Corsi numbers and a structured forecheck that forces low-danger looks and turns turnovers into controlled zone time. The power play is efficient, and the penalty kill is solid. Home form is strong, and they are on a stretch of consistent results heading into this final game before a short trip.
Chicago is the opposite profile: 4-12-1 with a -30 differential, scoring around 2.2 goals per game (near the bottom of the league) while allowing nearly 4. Their possession metrics are underwater, they bleed high-danger chances, and the road record is 0-7-1. When structure breaks, goals come in bunches against them. The talent gap in supporting cast and defensive layers is wide; one or two skilled forwards cannot offset the overall territorial and finishing issues.
Player vs player reinforces the same edge without needing a massive margin. Carolina’s forward group has multiple reliable producers. Logan Stankoven leads the team with 11 goals and is on a multi-game scoring run. Sebastian Aho sits near the top of the scoring list with 23 points. Jackson Blake, Andrei Svechnikov, and Nikolaj Ehlers provide secondary volume and finishing. The blue line (including pieces like Shayne Gostisbehere and K’Andre Miller) contributes to both transition and net-front protection. Depth scoring and two-way reliability across lines give Carolina a higher floor even on nights when the top options are checked.
Chicago’s primary threat is Connor Bedard, who has put up solid individual numbers (points in the double digits in limited games) and can create moments. Supporting production from players like Roman Kantserov has flashed, but the overall supporting cast is thinner, the plus-minus numbers reflect the team environment, and injuries (including Patrick Kane) further limit secondary options. Bedard’s production has not translated into team success against stronger defensive groups; Carolina’s layered structure and shot suppression limit the high-quality looks he needs to carry a result. When the top line is contained, Chicago’s secondary scoring has not been consistent enough to keep games close.
Recent and historical trends line up in the same direction. Carolina has controlled most recent meetings in the series and has the territorial and finishing edge that produces multi-goal wins against bottom-half teams. Early-season patterns show heavy favorites with elite possession and defensive metrics covering modest puck lines more often than not against teams ranked near the bottom in goals against and shot suppression. Chicago’s recent form includes multiple losses by two or more goals, and their road games have been especially difficult. League-wide, large system mismatches of this type (top-tier possession and defense against bottom-tier scoring and structure) have produced covers at a healthy rate when the number sits around 1.5 rather than inflated further. Carolina’s ability to generate volume while protecting the net front gives them a clear path to winning by two or more; the posted margin does not ask for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent results have typically delivered.
The moneyline is the higher-probability side if the price is acceptable, which is not. The puck line -1.5 better reflects the structural gap and the way Carolina has handled similar opponents. This is the cleanest side edge on today’s slate.
Denver enters this neutral-site game in Mexico City at 4-3 with a clear efficiency advantage and Nikola Jokic operating at an elite level. Indiana sits at 3-6 and will be without Tyrese Haliburton for the second consecutive game, shifting the entire creation burden onto Andrew Nembhard and the wings. The Nuggets just handled Toronto behind another Jokic triple-double, while the Pacers needed a late surge to edge Memphis. On a neutral floor the structural gap remains intact, and the posted number still favors the side with better possession control and higher-end talent.
Jokic continues to control the glass, the short roll, and the pace of the game. He generates both volume and efficiency while forcing defenses to commit extra bodies in the paint, which opens secondary scoring for Jamal Murray, Aaron Gordon, and Christian Braun. Those pieces have provided reliable complementary production this season, and the Nuggets have shown the ability to maintain efficiency even when the primary options are drawing heavy attention. Indiana’s frontcourt can occupy space around Pascal Siakam, yet without Haliburton the Pacers struggle to generate consistent high-quality looks against a Denver defense that ranks among the better units early in the season. Nembhard and the wings must carry a heavier creation load, which has historically limited Indiana’s ability to stress elite defensive schemes for full possessions. When a primary creator is sidelined and the opposing center dominates both ends, the margin has historically landed closer to double digits than a single-digit cover.
The systems themselves reinforce the same picture. Denver has played with better defensive structure and lower turnover rates through the first stretch of the season, funneling opponents into lower-percentage looks while converting the other way with speed through the neutral zone. Indiana has shown flashes off the rush and on the power play, but the Pacers spend too much time defending in their own zone when the structure breaks. Early-season numbers this high against quality opponents often come back when the talent gap is this pronounced, and the Nuggets’ controlled style gives them a clear path to covering a modest number on a neutral floor. The supporting cast on both sides is still integrating in spots, yet Denver’s primary options have already shown the sustained efficiency and defensive cohesion that routinely produces comfortable road or neutral wins.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. Denver has covered in its stronger performances this season and owns the talent mismatch. Indiana’s early home and neutral results have not produced the sustained defensive stops required against high-usage centers. League-wide, road or neutral favorites in the first ten days of the season against teams missing their primary ball-handler have covered at a higher rate when the number sits in the mid-to-high single digits. Historical meetings between these two have frequently stayed in ranges that favor the more efficient side, and the current injury list only widens that gap. The combination of the Haliburton absence, Jokic’s form, and Indiana’s early-season inconsistency makes the Nuggets the cleaner side. Denver should dictate tempo and win by a comfortable margin; the posted number aligns with both the systems and the individual matchups.
UNLV -10.5 vs Samford (4:00 PM ET)
UNLV gets the points at minus 10.5 or better against Samford today at Thomas & Mack Center (4:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. UNLV sits among the top 100 teams after a solid start and carries the efficiency profile of a mid-major contender with home-court experience in Las Vegas. Samford ranks outside the top 150 and was picked toward the middle of the SoCon. That talent difference is real and should produce a UNLV win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against mid-major visitors typically deliver. UNLV’s offense is still integrating pieces. Samford has shown it can grind possessions and stay within reach when the opposing system is not yet fully clicking at home.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a 10-point margin. UNLV’s primary scorers give the Rebels clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating. On the other side, Samford’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force UNLV to play through contact. When the top options on the favored side are still settling and the underdog’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to the mid-to-high single digits than the low teens.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. UNLV’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, but early-season efficiency issues often linger into the next outing against a mid-major visitor. Samford has historically stayed within large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, double-digit home favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number climbs past 10 points against mid-major opponents. The combination of an inflated early-season line, UNLV’s early form, and Samford’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. UNLV should control the game and win by double digits; the posted number simply asks for more tha
San Diego State -3 vs Colorado (3:30 PM ET)
San Diego State gets the points at minus 3 or better against Colorado today at Pechanga Arena (3:30 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. San Diego State sits among the top 75 teams after a solid start and carries the efficiency profile of a mid-major contender with home-court experience in San Diego. Colorado ranks outside the top 100 and is still integrating pieces after an early result. That talent difference is real and should produce a San Diego State win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November neutral-site games against mid-major visitors typically deliver. San Diego State’s offense is still integrating pieces. Colorado has shown it can grind possessions and stay within reach when the opposing system is not yet fully clicking.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a multi-point cover. San Diego State’s primary scorers give the Aztecs clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating. On the other side, Colorado’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force San Diego State to play through contact. When the top options on both sides are still settling and the home side’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to a short number than a multi-point favorite.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. San Diego State’s early-season home or neutral openers under the current staff have been strong, but early-season efficiency issues often linger into the next outing against a mid-major visitor. Colorado has historically stayed within short numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, short home or neutral favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number sits near 3 points against mid-major opponents. The combination of an inflated early-season line, San Diego State’s early form, and Colorado’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. San Diego State should control the game and win by a short margin; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
Memphis +2.5 vs VCU (3:00 PM ET)
Memphis gets the points at plus 2 or better against VCU today at FedExForum (3:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. VCU sits among the top 60 teams after a solid opener and carries the efficiency profile of a mid-major contender. Memphis ranks outside the top 100 but just upset Iowa State on the road and carries the home-court edge. That talent difference is real and should produce a competitive game, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against quality mid-major visitors typically deliver. VCU opened with an 82-72 win over Little Rock; the offense is still integrating new pieces. Memphis has shown it can score in bursts and force turnovers against quality competition, and the Tigers are not the same team that will face a VCU group still working through its own early-season issues on the road.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a VCU cover. Jayden Reid led Memphis with 26 points in the opener, while Luis Almodovar added 18 points and 8 rebounds. Those pieces give the Tigers clear individual advantages at home, yet the supporting cast is still integrating after roster turnover and the absence of Popovic. On the other side, Torey Alston and the VCU primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force Memphis to play through contact. When the top options on both sides are still settling and the home side’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to a pick’em than a multi-point road cover.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. Memphis’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, and the team just showed efficiency issues against a quality opponent that often produce closer margins the next time out. VCU has historically covered large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest on the road against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, short road favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number sits near 2 points against mid-major opponents coming off a competitive opener. The combination of an inflated early-season line, VCU’s road spot, and Memphis’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. VCU should control stretches of the game; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
Northern Arizona +23.5 at New Mexico (6:00 PM ET)
Northern Arizona gets the points at plus 23.5 or better against New Mexico today (6:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. New Mexico sits among the top 75 teams after a solid start and carries the efficiency profile of a mid-major contender. Northern Arizona ranks outside the top 200 and was picked toward the bottom of the Big Sky. That talent difference is real and should produce a New Mexico win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against low-major visitors typically deliver. New Mexico’s offense is still integrating pieces after an early win. Northern Arizona has shown it can grind possessions and stay within reach when the opposing system is not yet fully clicking at home.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a 23-point margin. New Mexico’s primary scorers give the Lobos clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating. On the other side, Northern Arizona’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force New Mexico to play through contact. When the top options on the favored side are still settling and the underdog’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to the mid-teens than the low 20s.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. New Mexico’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, but early-season efficiency issues often linger into the next outing against a lower-major visitor. Northern Arizona has historically stayed within large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, double-digit home favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number climbs past 20 points against low-major opponents. The combination of an inflated early-season line, New Mexico’s early form, and Northern Arizona’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. New Mexico should control the game and win by double digits; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
Omaha gets the points at plus 26.5 or better against Utah State today at Dee Glen Smith Spectrum (4:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. Utah State sits among the top 50 teams after a dominant opener and carries the efficiency profile of a mid-major contender. Omaha ranks outside the top 200, was picked toward the bottom of the Summit League, and just absorbed a heavy road loss to BYU. That talent difference is real and should produce a Utah State win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against low-major visitors typically deliver. Utah State opened with a 94-58 win over Idaho State; the offense is still integrating new pieces. Omaha has shown it can score in bursts against lesser competition, and the Mavericks are not the same team that will face a Utah State group still working through its own early-season issues at home.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a 26-point margin. Kingston Tosi led Utah State with 26 points in the opener, while the supporting cast added secondary scoring. Those pieces give the Aggies clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating after roster turnover and the absences of Turnbull and Mulholland. On the other side, Omaha’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force Utah State to play through contact. When the top options on the favored side are still settling and the underdog’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to the low-to-mid 20s than the mid-to-high 20s.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. Utah State’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, but the team just showed efficiency issues against a lower-major visitor that often linger into the next outing. Omaha has historically stayed within large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, double-digit home favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number climbs past 25 points against low-major opponents coming off a blowout. The combination of an inflated early-season line, Utah State’s unsettled opener, and Omaha’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. Utah State should control the game and win by double digits; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
New Mexico State +29.5 at Gonzaga (5:00 PM ET)
New Mexico State gets the points at plus 29.5 or better against Gonzaga today at McCarthey Athletic Center (5:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. Gonzaga sits among the top 15 teams after a competitive opener against Purdue and carries the efficiency profile of a high-major contender. New Mexico State ranks outside the top 150, was picked toward the middle of the WAC, and is missing a key guard for the season. That talent difference is real and should produce a Gonzaga win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against mid-major visitors typically deliver. Gonzaga opened with a 78-72 win over Purdue that required free-throw volume and second-half control; the offense is still integrating new transfers. New Mexico State has shown it can grind possessions and stay within reach when the opposing system is not yet fully clicking at home.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a 29-point margin. Davis Fogle led Gonzaga with 22 points in the opener, while Xaivian Lee and Izan Almansa added secondary scoring. Those pieces give the Bulldogs clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating after roster turnover. On the other side, New Mexico State’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force Gonzaga to play through contact against a thinner frontcourt. When the top options on the favored side are still settling and the underdog’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to the mid-20s than the high 20s.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. Gonzaga’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, but the team just played a neutral-site game against a quality opponent and showed free-throw dependence that often produces closer margins the next time out. New Mexico State has historically stayed within large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, double-digit home favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number climbs past 25 points against mid-major opponents coming off a competitive opener. The combination of an inflated early-season line, Gonzaga’s unsettled opener, and New Mexico State’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. Gonzaga should control the game and win by double digits; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
Best Play: Morehead State +38.5 at Louisville (12:00 PM ET)
Morehead State gets the points at plus 38.5 or better against Louisville today at KFC Yum! Center (12:00 PM ET), and the number leaves more room than the early-season gap between the two systems usually justifies. Louisville sits among the top 15 teams after a solid opener and carries the efficiency profile of a high-major contender. Morehead State ranks near the bottom of Division I, was picked toward the bottom of the OVC, and just absorbed a heavy road loss to Western Kentucky. That talent difference is real and should produce a Louisville win, yet the posted margin sits several points higher than what recent form and early-November home openers against low-major visitors typically deliver. Louisville opened with an 84-70 win over Chattanooga but faded in the second half after a strong start; the offense is still integrating new pieces. Morehead State has shown it can score in bursts against lesser competition, and the Eagles are not the same team that will face a Louisville group still working through its own early-season issues at home.
The player matchups reinforce the same picture without requiring a 38-point margin. Flory Bidunga led Louisville with 16 points and 9 rebounds in the opener, while Adrian Wooley, Seth Trimble, and Jackson Shelstad added secondary scoring. Those pieces give the Cardinals clear individual advantages, yet the supporting cast is still integrating after roster turnover and the absences of Montgomery and Dynes. On the other side, Morehead State’s primary scorers can at least occupy the ball for stretches and force Louisville to play through contact. When the top options on the favored side are still settling and the underdog’s primary scorers can keep the game from becoming completely one-sided, the margin tends to land closer to the low-to-mid 30s than the high 30s.
Recent results and longer-term patterns point the same direction. Louisville’s home openers under the current staff have been strong, but the team just showed second-half efficiency issues that often linger into the next outing against a lower-major visitor. Morehead State has historically stayed within large numbers more often than raw rankings suggest against higher-level programs, especially in the first week of the season when both sides are still rounding into form. League-wide, double-digit home favorites in the first ten days of the college basketball calendar have covered at a lower rate when the number climbs past 35 points against low-major opponents coming off a blowout. The combination of an inflated early-season line, Louisville’s unsettled opener, and Morehead State’s ability to keep the score from becoming completely one-sided is what makes the points the cleaner side. Louisville should control the game and win by double digits; the posted number simply asks for more than the systems, the individual matchups, and the recent trends have typically delivered.
An undefeated team ranked at the top of the country getting more than a touchdown on the road is the kind of number that stands out. Notre Dame’s home field and defense are real factors, and South Bend at night is a tough environment. Miami’s offense has been one of the more productive units in the country and has the playmakers to keep games from getting away. A touchdown is a lot to lay with the top-ranked team in a marquee night game. Miami doesn’t have to win outright for this to cash—they just need to stay competitive, which is the floor their current form suggests they can clear.
Ohio State is the better team and at home, which is why they are laying more than a touchdown. Oregon still has enough pieces to make this a game, especially if the Buckeyes are not at full strength offensively. Road underdogs in the Big Ten have found ways to cover when the number gets into the 7–8 range against teams that are still working through inconsistencies. Ohio State should be the better side, but the margin is large enough that Oregon can lose and still cover if they stay within a score late. That is the classic dog spot the number is offering.
Two 6-2 teams in Death Valley with playoff implications. LSU has the home field and the energy that comes with it, but Alabama has the talent and the recent series history to stay in these games. Models and efficiency numbers have these sides closer than a touchdown in a lot of spots. Getting more than a field goal in a game that often comes down to one or two big plays is the value. Alabama doesn’t have to steal this one outright; they just need to keep it competitive late, which is exactly the kind of game this matchup tends to produce
Both teams are 6-2 and the line has moved toward the home side. Missouri has been solid at home and has a defense that can make life difficult for teams that rely on rhythm. Texas has talent but has shown they can be inconsistent when the environment gets loud and the game tightens. A short number on the road favorite in Columbia is the kind of spot where the home dog has historically had value. Expect a game that stays within a field goal or a touchdown either way. The Tigers don’t need to win outright for the points to cash—they just need to keep it in the range most people already expect.
Both teams are 6-2 and the line has moved toward the home side. Missouri has been solid at home and has a defense that can make life difficult for teams that rely on rhythm. Texas has talent but has shown they can be inconsistent when the environment gets loud and the game tightens. A short number on the road favorite in Columbia is the kind of spot where the home dog has historically had value. Expect a game that stays within a field goal or a touchdown either way. The Tigers don’t need to win outright for the points to cash—they just need to keep it in the range most people already expect.
The Holy War has a long history of staying closer than people expect when both teams are good. Utah is undefeated and at home, which is why they are favored, but BYU has already shown they can win this series and compete in big environments. Early kickoff in Salt Lake adds another layer of noise for both sides. The number around a field goal to a touchdown feels like it gives Utah credit for being perfect without fully accounting for how physical and familiar this rivalry gets. Taking the points with the team that has already beaten them recently is the side that has the margin for error.
SERVICE BIO
Experience & Awards
I have been wagering professionally on sports and horse racing for 30 years.
My picks have been documented for 22 years.
I was the 2009 NFL Handicapper of the Year in 2009 in a prestigious event. I won the Ultimate Football NFL Championship in 2006.
I have been an NBA World Champion with 9 winning seasons the last 11 years.
I also continue to beat the College Hoops book makers with a high volume attack on a yearly basis.
Handicapping Approach
I have a firm belief in my systems. There is not a sport I feel I can not beat.
My handicapping can be best referred to as the 'The Smart Money Approach". I leave no stone unturned. I have a large database of information and statistics. I also take into consideration injuries, current and historical trends, and form. I also factor in the weather, surface conditions, and line movement.
Sports Betting Is An Investment
Many gamblers offer causal explanations for long runs of good and bad performance. The same is true of financial analysts. The records of bettors and investors show the same variable successes and failures.
Both investment opportunities show significant variables and both can give the investor an advantage. You need to do the proper research to consider all the facts. If you do so a long term profit is more than attainable.
I think sports betting is even better than the stock market. The investor/bettor has much more control over his funds. You can take a short break, and almost always know your bankroll has not been untouched.
In the markets you are leaving your 401K and other mutual investments in the hands of a volatile marketplace. Plus, you are being torched for huge handling fees by brokers on individual investments. These fees would make sports book managers drool.
I am not saying it is easy making a living from sports betting. But, the small percent who do consistently beat the books have a much better rate of return than that of any market investor!
This is the outlook I have on every wager I place in the sports wagering markets. I take my portfolio very seriously!
Money Management
To be a successful and profitable sports bettor you must always have a long term goal. Set that standard before you begin. You need to set aside a fairly substantial bankroll.
If you want to be conservative you would wager no more than 1-2% of your bankroll per game. No more than 3% on the best bets.
This might seem a little on the low side. But, this is a long and turbulent battle with the books. You will be happy that you practiced good money management and frugality.
Here are some additional guidelines I recommend.
1. Shop for your best possible lines (rogue lines) from the most reputable sources.
2. Stay disciplined and do not stray from recommended bankroll allocation on individual wagers. Chasing your wagers never a good idea.
3. Always keep in mind that your bankroll is your life line. It must be treated the same way you would treat finances allocated for any business venture.
4. Dont Buy off the hook on key numbers.(long term bettors) For weekend warriors use your discretion
5. Understanding the importance and the art of middling.
6. Keep a record of all your wagers and results and use them as part of over all statistical data base.
These are some important factors that will help you in your quest for long term profits.
I leave you with a thought from the late great Jimmy the Greek. The house does not beat the player, it just gives him the opportunity to beat himself.
*All selections have the same allocated bankroll %(which equals 1 betting unit).




